Alan Lescht & Associates federal employment lawyer

Alan Lescht & Associates is an employment law firm located in Washinton D.C, and is recognized as one of the most notable one. Alan Lescht & Associates has been operating in Northern Virginia and Maryland for more than 20 years. Their expertise relies in protecting the rights of employees in complex employment cases.

In fact an employment law attorney represents workers in cases such as discrimination, wrongful termination, workplace safety and unfair labor practices in general. As stated, in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, an employee can not be discriminated based on his race, color, religion, sex or national origin. An EEO lawyer is here to help protect such rights.

One area of expertise of Alan Lescht & Associates is into federal employee issues. Those types of cases can be extremely complex and they do take time. Thus, dealing with a federal employment lawyer can be a necessity, as they have experience in this kind of environment.

If you have suffered any kind of harassment or discrimination, Alan Lescht & Associated is the law firm with the experience and results you need. They got several multi-million-dollar settlements in the past. They will remain attentive and answer any questions you may have during your case.

Contact information:

Alan Lescht & Associates, P.C.
1050 17th Street, NW Suite 220
Washington, DC 20036-5545
tel: (202) 463-6036
fax: (202) 463-6067

Posted by admin on May 19th, 2009 under USA Health PrivacyTags: , , ,  • No Comments

Health and Medical Privacy in Virginia

New advancements in health record technology raise questions about privacy and security. Consumers are worried that someone might be able to hack into health systems to gain access to private health information.

Federal and state privacy laws such as HIPAA are designed to protect both paper and electronic health records. Systems must be designed to meet these stringent requirements. Any certified electronic system must be password protected, and all files need to be encrypted.

Unlike with paper health records, a log is created every time someone views an electronic health record. In addition, access to certain parts of health records can be regulated by password and system design.
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by admin on February 20th, 2009 under Virginia Health PrivacyTags: , , , , ,  • 1 Comment

The Privacy Rule in USA

The Privacy Rule provides federal protections for personal health information held by covered entities and gives patients an array of rights with respect to that information. At the same time, the Privacy Rule is balanced so that it permits the disclosure of personal health information needed for patient care and other important purposes.

Your Health Information Is Protected By Federal Law

Most of us believe that our medical and other health information is private and should be protected, and we want to know who has this information. The Privacy Rule, a Federal law, gives you rights over your health information and sets rules and limits on who can look at and receive your health information.

Who Must Follow This Law

We call the entities that must follow the Privacy Rule covered entities.

Covered entities include:

  • Health Plans, including Health Insurance companies, HMOs, company health plans, and certain government programs that pay for health care, such as Medicare and Medicaid.
  • Most Health Care Providers—those that conduct certain business electronically, such as electronically billing your health insurance—including most doctors, clinics, hospitals, psychologists, chiropractors, nursing homes, pharmacies, and dentists.
  • Health Care Clearinghouses—entities that process nonstandard health information they receive from another entity into a standard (i.e., standard electronic format or data content), or vice versa.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by admin on February 18th, 2009 under USA Health PrivacyTags: , , , ,  • No Comments

Privacy of Health Information in Australia

The Privacy Amendment (Private Sector) Act 2000 extends the operation of the Privacy Act 1988 to cover the private health sector throughout Australia.

The co-regulatory approach offered by the legislation allows for flexibility in how organisations (including health service providers) deal with their privacy obligations, while ensuring standards apply to the protection of personal information, including health information. The legislation recognises the particularly sensitive nature of health information, and places extra protections around its handling, including enforcement mechanisms to deal with breaches of the privacy standards.

In the private health sector, the legislation will complement the existing culture of confidentiality that is fundamental to many health service providers’ professional practice obligations.

The legislation, through its ten National Privacy Principles, promotes greater openness between health service providers and consumers regarding the handling of health information. The legislation introduces, for instance, a general right of access for consumers to their own health records, and requires health service providers to have available documentation that clearly sets out their policies for the management of personal information.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by admin on February 16th, 2009 under Australia Health PrivacyTags: , , ,  • No Comments

Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec

A true pioneer in North America in the area of access to information and protection of privacy, Québec devoted three decades to devising an innovative legislative framework that has paved the way for the introduction of similar measures throughout the Canadian federation. Twenty-five years after its inception, this innovative framework, as embodied by the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec, is intended as an essential reference for all Western countries with regard to access to information and protection of privacy.

The Commission d’accès à l’information, which is under the authority of the Québec National Assembly, was created in 1982 further to increasing public concern over the issues involved in protecting privacy and providing access to information. From the start of the 70s, this interest in the so-called “new law” showed up gradually in a number of statutes enacted at that time. As early as 1971, with the passage of the Consumer Protection Act, the legislator broke new ground by ensuring all persons right of access to their credit record. Laws governing professions, such as the Professional Code, enshrined principles such as professional secrecy and the confidential nature of personal information.

In enacting the Charter of human rights and freedoms, the Québec National Assembly recognized the right of all persons to respect for their privacy as well as their right to information and, in so doing, took an historic legislative step that would lay the legal foundations for fundamental principles.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by admin on February 15th, 2009 under Quebec Health PrivacyTags: , ,  • No Comments

The Personal Health Information Act of Manitoba

The Personal Health Information Act (PHIA) provides you with the right to:

  1. access your personal health information, and
  2. have your personal health information kept private

when that information is held by a health care provider, health care facility or public body (referred to in the Act as “trustees“).

Click here to view The Personal Health Information Act (PHIA).

Click here to view The Personal Health Information Act (PHIA) Regulation.

Access

The right of access means that you can ask to see, or get a copy of, personal health information about you.  You also have the right to request a correction to this information if you feel it is inaccurate or incomplete.

Access to your health records allows you to make informed decisions, based on complete information, about your health and health care.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by admin on February 14th, 2009 under Manitoba Health Privacy, Rules and RegulationsTags: , , , ,  • 1 Comment

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act in British Columbia

Part 1 — Introductory Provisions
1 Definitions
2 Purposes of this Act
3 Scope of this Act
Part 2 — Freedom of Information
Division 1 — Information Rights and How to Exercise Them
4 Information rights
5 How to make a request
6 Duty to assist applicants
7 Time limit for responding
8 Contents of response
9 How access will be given
10 Extending the time limit for responding
11 Transferring a request
Division 2 — Exceptions
12 Cabinet and local public body confidences
13 Policy advice or recommendations
14 Legal advice
15 Disclosure harmful to law enforcement
16 Disclosure harmful to intergovernmental relations or negotiations
17 Disclosure harmful to the financial or economic interests of a public body
18 Disclosure harmful to the conservation of heritage sites, etc.
19 Disclosure harmful to individual or public safety
20 Information that will be published or released within 60 days
21 Disclosure harmful to business interests of a third party
22 Disclosure harmful to personal privacy
22.1 Disclosure of information relating to abortion services
Division 3 — Notice to Third Parties
23 Notifying the third party
24 Time limit and notice of decision
Division 4 — Public Interest Paramount
25 Information must be disclosed if in the public interest
Part 3 — Protection of Privacy
Division 1 — Collection, Protection and Retention of Personal Information by Public Bodies
26 Purpose for which personal information may be collected
27 How personal information is to be collected
28 Accuracy of personal information
29 Right to request correction of personal information
30 Protection of personal information
30.1 Storage and access must be in Canada
30.2 Obligation to report foreign demand for disclosure
30.3 Whistle-blower protection
30.4 Unauthorized disclosure prohibited
30.5 Notification of unauthorized disclosure
31 Retention of personal information
31.1 Application to employees and others
Division 2 — Use and Disclosure of Personal Information by Public Bodies
32 Use of personal information
33 Disclosure of personal information
33.1 Disclosure inside or outside Canada
33.2 Disclosure inside Canada only
34 Definition of consistent purposes
35 Disclosure for research or statistical purposes
36 Disclosure for archival or historical purposes
Part 4 — Office and Powers of Information and Privacy Commissioner
37 Appointment of commissioner
38 Resignation, removal or suspension of commissioner
39 Acting commissioner
40 Salary, expenses and benefits of commissioner
41 Staff of commissioner
42 General powers of commissioner
43 Power to authorize a public body to disregard requests
44 Powers of commissioner in conducting investigations, audits or inquiries
44.1 Maintenance of order at hearings
44.2 Contempt proceeding for uncooperative person
45 Statements made to the commissioner not admissible in evidence
46 Protection against libel or slander actions
47 Restrictions on disclosure of information by the commissioner and staff
48 Protection of commissioner and staff
49 Delegation by commissioner
50 Role of Ombudsman
51 Annual report of commissioner
Part 5 — Reviews and Complaints
Division 1 — Reviews by the Commissioner
52 Right to ask for a review
53 How to ask for a review
54 Notifying others of review
54.1 Order for the severing of records
55 Mediation may be authorized
56 Inquiry by commissioner
57 Burden of proof
58 Commissioner’s orders
59 Duty to comply with orders
Division 2 — Investigations and Reviews by Adjudicator
59.1 References to commissioner
60 Adjudicator to investigate complaints and review decisions
60.1 Disregard of request under section 5 or 29
61 Powers, duties and protections of adjudicator
62 Right to ask for a review
63 How to ask for a review
64 Notifying others of review
65 Conduct and outcome of the review
Part 6 — General Provisions
66 Delegation by the head of a public body
67 Consultative committee
68 Annual report of minister
69 General information respecting use of personal information
69.1 Public information regarding health information banks
70 Policy manuals available without request
71 Records available without request
72 Public record index
73 Protection of public body from legal suit
74 General offences and penalties
74.1 Privacy protection offences
75 Fees
76 Power to make regulations
76.1 Ministerial regulation making power
77 Power to make bylaws
78 Appropriation
79 Relationship of Act to other Acts
80 Review of Act
81 Right to disclose preserved

Posted by admin on February 13th, 2009 under British Columbia Health PrivacyTags: ,  • No Comments

The FOIP Act in Alberta

The FOIP Act provides the authority for the Information and Privacy Commissioner to comment on the implications for freedom of information or for protection of privacy of proposed legislative schemes or programs of public bodies. Privacy impact assessments are not mandatory under the FOIP Act, but are recommended for major projects that involve the collection, use or disclosure of personal information.

The HIA requires that the Information and Privacy Commissioner receive a privacy impact assessment for review and comment before a custodian implements proposed administrative practices and information systems relating to the collection, use or disclosure of individually identifying health information. Privacy impact assessments are mandatory under the HIA if the project fits the foregoing definition.

The Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner has developed a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) process to assist organizations in reviewing the impact that the new project may have on the individual privacy. The process is designed to ensure that the public body or custodian evaluates the program or scheme to ensure compliance with the FOIP Act or HIA.
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by admin on February 12th, 2009 under Alberta Health PrivacyTags: , , ,  • No Comments

Pan-Canadian Health Information Privacy and Confidentiality Framework

Canadians expect and have confidence that the privacy and confidentiality of their personal information will be protected when governments use it in the course of providing programs and services. In no field is the maintenance of this trust more critical than in the health sector.

Recognizing the importance of privacy, the Federal/Provincial/Territorial Conference of Deputy Ministers of Health tasked its Advisory Committee on Information and Emerging Technologies to develop a Pan-Canadian Health Information Privacy and Confidentiality Framework.

The objective of the Framework is to respond to Canadians’ privacy and confidentiality expectations and to suggest a harmonized set of core provisions for the collection, use and disclosure of personal health information in both the publicly and privately funded sectors. Consistent, or at least more consistent, privacy regimes among jurisdictions would facilitate health care renewal, including the development of electronic health record systems and primary health care reform.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by admin on February 11th, 2009 under Canada Health PrivacyTags: , ,  • No Comments

Confidentiality of Personal Health Information in Nova Scotia

Confidentiality is the cornerstone of the patient-pharmacist relationship. Patients have a right to expect that their pharmacist(s) will hold their personal health information in strict confidence. In order to assist pharmacists in their obligation to preserve the privacy of their patients, the following guidelines were developed:

1. Personal health information is privileged and confidential and should not be released to any person without the consent of the patient or the patient’s agent (someone legally entrusted to handle the patient’s affairs). Confidentiality is owed to all patients, regardless of age. Therefore, pharmacists should use professional judgement in releasing information to the parent of a minor. In the case of older children, the consent of the child should be obtained prior to the release of personal health information.

2. Demographic information (address, date of birth, etc.) is also considered confidential. To ensure that this type of information is not inadvertently disclosed during the process of confirming patient identity, pharmacists should ask patients to provide information for confirmation purposes.

3. Pharmacists should not release any data which reveals any specific identifier or demographic information about patients or provide information about medication dispensed which could compromise the patient’s identity.

4. Pharmacists should take care that patient information is not seen or overheard by other customers, tradespeople, service crews, pharmaceutical representatives, etc., who may be in or about the dispensary.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by admin on February 10th, 2009 under Nova Scotia Health PrivacyTags: , ,  • No Comments